COMPARISON OF ORAL ESTROGENS AND ESTROGENS PLUS ANDROGEN ON BONE-MINERAL DENSITY, MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS, AND LIPID-LIPOPROTEIN PROFILES IN SURGICAL MENOPAUSE
Nb. Watts et al., COMPARISON OF ORAL ESTROGENS AND ESTROGENS PLUS ANDROGEN ON BONE-MINERAL DENSITY, MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS, AND LIPID-LIPOPROTEIN PROFILES IN SURGICAL MENOPAUSE, Obstetrics and gynecology, 85(4), 1995, pp. 529-537
Objective: To compare an oral estrogen-androgen combination with estro
gens alone on bone, menopausal symptoms, and lipoprotein profiles in p
ostmenopausal women. Methods: Surgically menopausal women received ora
l esterified estrogens (1.25 mg), or esterified estrogens (1.25 mg) an
d methyltestosterone (2.5 mg) daily, for 2 years. Bone mineral density
of the lumbar spine and hip, menopausal symptoms, lipoprotein profile
s, and biochemical and hematologic indices were evaluated. Results: Si
xty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Both treatment regimens p
revented bone loss at the spine and hip; combined estrogen-androgen th
erapy was associated with a significant increase in spinal bone minera
l density compared with baseline (n = 24; mean score +/- standard erro
r 3.4 +/- 1.2%, P < .01). In the estrogen group, high-density lipoprot
ein (HDL) cholesterol increased significantly and low-density lipoprot
ein cholesterol decreased significantly. Cholesterol, HDL cholesterol,
and triglycerides decreased significantly in the estrogen-androgen gr
oup. Menopausal symptoms of somatic origin (hot flashes, vaginal dryne
ss, and insomnia) were improved significantly by both treatments. Neit
her adverse hepatic effects nor significant safety or tolerance proble
ms were reported in either group. Conclusion: Oral estrogen-androgen i
ncreased vertebral bone mineral density compared with pre-treatment va
lues and relieved somatic symptoms. Safety indices, including lipoprot
ein levels, indicated that the combination was well tolerated over the
2 years of treatment.