Ra. Mclaren et al., ESTIMATORS OF BIRTH-WEIGHT IN PREGNANT-WOMEN REQUIRING INSULIN - A COMPARISON OF 7 SONOGRAPHIC MODELS, Obstetrics and gynecology, 85(4), 1995, pp. 565-569
Objective: To determine if the relative accuracy of the sonographic es
timate of birth weight among diabetic gravidas requiring insulin impro
ves significantly as more fetal measurements are used. Methods: We stu
died 172 diabetic women requiring insulin who had sonographic measurem
ents of fetal parts within 7 days of delivery. Friedman nonparametric
analysis of variance followed by Dunn multiple comparison and X(2) wer
e used to assess the relative accuracy of the seven models. Prediction
limits were calculated to determine the estimate of fetal weight that
would ensure (with 90% accuracy) that the newborn was macrosomic (at
least 4 kg). Results: The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) birth wei
ght was 3388 +/- 727 g, and the frequency of macrosomia at term gestat
ion was 19.4% (29 of 149). The mean standardized absolute error (g/kg)
based on abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) (86 +/- 7
2 g/kg) was not significantly different from the other models (range 8
4 +/- 72 to 116 +/- 99 g/kg, P > .05). The percent of estimate within
10% of actual birth weight using AC and FL (65%) was similar to the ot
her models (53.4-66.2%). Regardless of the White classification, the e
stimation of fetal weight using AC and FL had an accuracy similar to t
he other six regression equations. To ensure that the birth weight is
at most 3999 g, the estimated fetal weight should be 3200 g, and, conv
ersely, if the predicted weight is 4700 g, then the newborn is macroso
mic. Conclusion: Among patients requiring insulin, estimation of birth
weight using AC and FL is as accurate as more complicated models. The
ability to detect macrosomia by ultrasound is limited.