Sj. Aldington et al., METHODOLOGY FOR RETINAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND ASSESSMENT OF DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY - THE EURODIAB IDDM COMPLICATIONS STUDY, Diabetologia, 38(4), 1995, pp. 437-444
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
We present the methodology for 45 degrees retinal photography and deta
il the development, application and validation of a new system of 45 d
egrees field grading standards for the assessment of diabetic retinopa
thy. The systems were developed for the EURO-DIAB IDDM Complications S
tudy, part of a European Community funded Concerted Action Programme i
nto the epidemiology and prevention of diabetes (EURODIAB). Assessment
of diabetic retinopathy was carried out centrally by a trained reader
of colour retinal photographs using the newly-developed system. The s
ystem proved to be acceptably accurate, repeatable and relatively simp
le to apply. It compared well with the recognised 'gold standard' 7-fi
eld 30 degrees stereo photography (assessed using a modified Airlie Ho
use classification scheme), against which the new system was validated
in a series of 48 eyes. Selection was as a stratified random sample b
ased on clinical retinopathy status: 5, no retinopathy; 25, non-prolif
erative retinopathy; 16, proliferative or photocoagulated; plus 2, eye
s with potentially confounding lesions (vein occlusion). Simple presen
ce of retinal lesions was correctly detected by both systems in 43 of
the 48 eyes, giving 100 % agreement on detection. Both systems correct
ly identified the two known cases of confounding vein occlusion. In ey
es with diabetic retinopathy (n = 41), when severity was expressed in
three groups: mild background, moderate/severe background and prolifer
ative/ photocoagulated, at least one grader (out of five) using the ne
w system matched the verified results in 38 out of 41 (93 %) eyes and
three or more graders matched in 31 (76 %) eyes. Individually the five
graders' 2-field allocations agreed well with the verified levels (me
dian number of agreements 37, range 28-43). Repeatability was assessed
by measures of within and between observer variation using randomly s
elected samples of 10 % (n = 252 eyes) and 5 % (n = 123 eyes) of the m
ain study, respectively, expressed as a resultant kappa value for chan
ce-corrected proportional agreement. Within observer assessment yielde
d a kappa of 0.85 and between observers a value of 0.83 indicating ver
y good agreement for both measures. The method is particularly useful
for large epidemiological studies, in which participating centres have
a limited experience in retinal photography.