R. Papandrea et al., BIOMECHANICAL AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE EPITENON-FIRST TECHNIQUEOF FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR, The Journal of hand surgery, 20A(2), 1995, pp. 261-266
Thirteen matched pairs of canine flexor tendons were repaired using bo
th the Epitenon-first and the modified Kessler with an epitendinous ru
nning suture. These were then tested to failure with a longitudinal fo
rce in an Instron test machine. Human cadaver flexor digitorum profund
us tendons were used to determine the cross sectional area of the tend
on that is displaced by suture material of the Kessler repair and Epit
enon-first core suture. Results of biomechanical testing revealed the
epitenon-first technique to be 22% stronger than the modified Kessler
technique. Comparison of tendon repair cross sectional contact areas b
y digital; scanning of surface photomicrographs demonstrated 20% of th
e surface area of the repair is occupied by the knot of the modified K
essler technique, while the core suture of the epitenon-first repair c
onsumed only 2.6% of the cross sectional area. These findings correlat
e with our clinical results of 26 zone II flexor tendon repairs in 18
patients repaired with the epitenon-first technique over a 4-year peri
od. Of these, there has been one rupture and no repeat operations for
lysis of adhesions.