CURRENT STATUS OF RESIDENCY PROGRAMS - SURVEY OF PROGRAM DIRECTORS

Citation
Sb. Gay et al., CURRENT STATUS OF RESIDENCY PROGRAMS - SURVEY OF PROGRAM DIRECTORS, Academic radiology, 2(3), 1995, pp. 254-259
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
10766332
Volume
2
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
254 - 259
Database
ISI
SICI code
1076-6332(1995)2:3<254:CSORP->2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives. This survey was compiled to provide current data on the structure and content of radiology residency programs and the role of the residency program director. Methods. A survey, created in electronic form and on paper, was distributed to all United States academic, private, and military radiology residency program directors . Results. Of the 202 survey forms distributed, 168 (83%) were complet ed and returned. Eighty percent of respondents support national curric ulum guidelines, but most do not favor national curriculum requirement s. About half (53%) of programs spend 6 months in ''view box'' nuclear medicine; others provide some experience by lectures and on-call time . Most programs (60%) relieve residents of some call during the senior year. Some programs (28%) allow seniors time away from clinical dutie s to study for the oral board exam, and 17% permit time away to study for the written boards, Seventy-eight percent of programs have had a ' 'problem resident,'' and 47% have asked a resident to leave the progra m. Directors' most frequently expressed concern was threat of diminish ed residency numbers due to decreased funding.