Ho. Karnath, SUBJECTIVE BODY ORIENTATION IN NEGLECT AND THE INTERACTIVE CONTRIBUTION OF NECK MUSCLE PROPRIOCEPTION AND VESTIBULAR STIMULATION, Brain, 117, 1994, pp. 1001-1012
Three patients with a right, predominantly parietal lesion and marked
left-sided neglect without visual field defects were asked to direct a
laser point to the position which they felt to lie exactly 'straight
ahead' of their bodies orientation Whereas in both light and darkness,
the subjective body orientation was close to the objective body posit
ion in the control groups, the three neglect patients localized the bo
dy's sagittal midplane similar to 15 degrees to the right of the objec
tive orientation. No relevant differences of 'straight ahead' were fou
nd between the neglect patients and controls in the vertical plane. Th
e neglect patients' horizontal displacement of sagittal midplane to th
e right could be compensated for either by neck muscle vibration or by
caloric vestibular stimulation on the left side. When vestibular stim
ulation was combined with neck muscle vibration, the horizontal deviat
ion linearly combined by adding or neutralizing the effects observed w
hen both types of stimulation were applied exclusively in the control
groups as well as in the neglect patients. Moreover; data analysis rev
ealed that the neglect patients' ipsilesionally displaced subjective b
ody orientation does not result fi om a disturbed primary perception o
r disturbed transmission of the vestibular or proprioceptive input fro
m the periphery. The present results support the hypothesis that the e
ssential aspect leading to neglect in brain-damaged patients is a dist
urbance of those cortical structures that are crucial for transforming
the sensory input coordinates from the peripheral sensory organs-here
the retina, neck muscle spindles and cuprlae-into an egocentric, body
-centred coordinate frame of reference. In neglect patients the coordi
nate transformation seems to work with a systematic error and deviatio
n of the spatial reference frame to the ipsilesional side leading to a
corresponding displacement of subjective localization of body orienta
tion. It can be concluded further that neck muscle proprioception and
vestibular stimulation directly interact in contributing to the subjec
t's mental representation of space. The data suggest that the afferent
information from these different input channels is used simultaneousl
y for computing egocentric, body-centred coordinates that allow us to
determine our body position in space.