C. Campana et al., EFFICACY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF SIMVASTATIN IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 29(3), 1995, pp. 235-239
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of simvastatin administ
ered to a group of heart transplant patients receiving triple-drug imm
unosuppressive therapy. We also assessed the potential pharmacokinetic
interaction between simvastatin and cyclosporine by comparing mean pl
asma concentrations of simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid, the major metabo
lite of the drug, in a group of heart transplant patients treated with
cyclosporine and in a control group of patients who had not received
heart transplants. Both groups received long-term (>6 wk) simvastatin
therapy. DESIGN: We monitored hyperlipidemia in 20 hypercholesterolemi
c heart transplant patients receiving simvastatin 10 mg/d and triple-d
rug immunosuppressive therapy. Changes in laboratory results before an
d after 4 months of simvastatin therapy were considered. The same labo
ratory data were monitored in a control group of 20 nonhypercholestero
lemic heart transplant patients who were not treated with simvastatin
but were receiving triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. Plasma conce
ntrations of simvastatin beta-hydroxy acid were measured in 14 hyperch
olesterolemic patients, 7 of whom had received heart transplants and 7
who had not. SETTING: The Division of Cardiology and the First Medica
l Clinic for the clinical study, as well as the Department of Pharmaco
logy for the pharmacokinetic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Forty heart trans
plant patients and 7 hypercholesterolemic nontransplant patients. MAIN
OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness of simvastatin was determined by comp
aring cholesterol and lipoprotein plasma concentrations in 20 patients
who underwent heart transplant and were treated with simvastatin for
4 months. The safety of the drug was determined by analyzing changes i
n laboratory results in the treated group and in the control group, bo
th those who had received heart transplants and those who had received
immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: After 4 months of simvastatin the
rapy, total cholesterol decreased by 12.5% and low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol decreased by 21.3%. The only statistically significant la
boratory change was an increase of 28.7% in the alanine aminotransfera
se concentrations. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin beta-hydroxy a
cid were higher in heart transplant patients than in those who had not
received heart transplants, the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dosag
e simvastatin treatment seems to be safe and sufficiently effective to
decrease cholesterol concentrations. Concomitant treatment with immun
osuppressive therapy (primarily cyclosporine) in heart transplant pati
ents appeared to cause a reduced metabolic clearance of simvastatin fr
om the plasma. More extensive studies on the interaction between simva
statin and cyclosporine are needed to understand the marked variabilit
y found in the response to simvastatin.