The increased popularity of the label ''cultural'' within science stud
ies, especially in relation to ''cultural studies,'' invites considera
tion of how it is and can be used in historical work. A lot more seems
now to be invested in the notion of ''cultural history.'' This articl
e examines some recent historiography of science as a means of conside
ring what counts as cultural history in that domain and attempts to co
ordinate it with the sociologically informed studies of the past ten o
r fifteen years. The label ''sociocultural'' seems a more useful term
by which to capture recent developments.