Jh. Frank et Ed. Mccoy, INTRODUCTION TO INSECT BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE BEAUTIFUL - NON-INDIGENOUS SPECIES IN FLORIDA, The Florida entomologist, 78(1), 1995, pp. 1-15
An excessive proportion of adventive (= ''non-indigenous'') species in
a community has been called ''biological pollution.'' Proportions of
adventive species of fishes, amphibia, reptiles, birds and mammals in
southern Florida range from 16% to more than 42%. In Florida as a whol
e, the proportion of adventive plants is about 26%, but of insects is
only about 8%. Almost all of the vertebrates were introduced as captiv
e pets, but escaped or were released into the wild, and established br
eeding populations; few arrived as immigrants (= ''of their own voliti
on''). Almost all of the plants also were introduced, a few arrived as
immigrants (as contaminants of shipments of seeds or other cargoes).
In contrast, only 42 insect species (0.3%) were introduced (all for bi
ological control of pests, including weeds). The remainder (about 946
species, or 7.6%) arrived as undocumented immigrants, some of them as
fly-ins, but many as contaminants of cargoes. Most of the major insect
pests of agriculture, horticulture, human-made structures, and the en
vironment, arrived as hitchhikers (contaminants of, and stowaways in,
cargoes, especially cargoes of plants). No adventive insect species ca
using problems in Florida was introduced (deliberately) as far as is k
nown. The cause of most of the so-called biological pollution is the p
ublic's demand for ''pet'' animals and ''ornamental'' plants of foreig
n origin, the public's environmental irresponsibility in handling thes
e organisms, the dealers' willingness to supply these organisms for ca
sh, and governments' unwillingness to stem the flow of a lucrative com
merce. The cause of almost all of the remaining part is flight, walkin
g, swimming, and rafting from adjoining states and from nearby countri
es in the Caribbean, Mexico and Central America. The introduction of s
pecialized insect biological control agents, although it contributes t
o biological pollution, appears to be an environmentally-sound solutio
n to the much greater biological pollution caused by immigrant insects
and introduced plants in Florida. Greater concern for insects as livi
ng things, or as integral parts of nature, coupled with increased unde
rstanding of how problem insects get into Florida, may foster a more e
ven-handed approach to the reduction of biological pollution.