EVALUATION OF RADIATIVE PARAMETERIZATIONS USING AN EXPLICIT CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL MODEL

Citation
Zn. Kogan et al., EVALUATION OF RADIATIVE PARAMETERIZATIONS USING AN EXPLICIT CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL MODEL, Atmospheric research, 35(2-4), 1995, pp. 157-172
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01698095
Volume
35
Issue
2-4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
157 - 172
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-8095(1995)35:2-4<157:EORPUA>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Based on the simulations with a 3-D large-eddy simulation model of mar ine cloud-topped boundary layer that includes explicit cloud physics f ormulation, we have evaluated the effect of spatial inhomogeneities in cloud macro- and microstructure on the performance of parameterizatio ns of optical depth commonly used in large-scale models. We have shown that an accurate parameterization of the grid average optical depth a lone is not sufficient for correct determination of cloud transmittanc e to solar radiation due to the non-linear dependence between these tw o variables. The problem can be solved by introducing the ''equivalent '' value of optical depth that differs from the ordinarily defined mea n optical depth by a factor alpha(t) that depends on the degree of clo ud inhomogeneity and ranges from about 2 in the cumulus case to about 1.3 in the stratiform case. The accuracy of cloud optical depth parame terizations commonly employed in large-scale models has been evaluated using the data from the explicit microphysical model as a benchmark f or comparison. It has been shown that in the cumulus cloud case the pa rameterized expressions can err by as much as 100%. The error is small er for more uniform stratiform clouds, where the error for some parame terizations varied in the 10-40% range. The best results are given by parameterizations that account for vertical stratification of paramete rs on which they are based. However, the error given by a particular p arameterization varies and is different at cloud and surface levels. T he results show the limitations of the existing simplified parameteriz ations and illustrate the scope and complexity of the cloud radiation parameterization problem.