OF LICE AND MEN - THE RETURN OF THE COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY DEBATE

Citation
Am. Paterson et al., OF LICE AND MEN - THE RETURN OF THE COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY DEBATE, Parasitology today, 11(4), 1995, pp. 158-160
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Parasitiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01694758
Volume
11
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
158 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-4758(1995)11:4<158:OLAM-T>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
The question of whether or not parasite phylogeny provides information about host relationships ('comparative parasitology') reached a peak in 1957 in a vigorous debate between Gunther Timmermann and Ernst Mayr . Timmermann argued that parasites were associated with their hosts by descent and that this produced congruent host and parasite phylogenie s. In contrast, Mayr argued that parasites were often associated by co lonization and that this led to incongruence between host and parasite phylogenies. To test these differing views, Adrian Paterson, Russell Gray and Graham Wallis derived a procellariiform phylogeny. This tree is here compared with Timmermann's tree based on the relationships of feather lice. Timmermann's tree is more similar to the seabird phyloge ny that would be expected by chance. Thus, support is found for the 'c omparative parasitology' approach.