This paper develops a model of the political economy of tax-setting in
a multijurisdictional would, where voters' choices and incumbent beha
vior are determined simultaneously. Voters are assumed to make compari
sons between jurisdictions to overcome political agency problems. This
forces incumbents into a (yardstick) competition in which they care a
bout what other incumbents are doing. We provide a theoretical framewo
rk and empirical evidence using U.S. stare data from 1960 to 1988. The
results are encouraging to the view that vote-seeking and tar-setting
are tied together through the nexus of yardstick competition.