EFFECT OF INTERPLEURAL ADMINISTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE OR LIDOCAINE ON PAIN AND MORPHINE REQUIREMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH THORACOTOMY - ARANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND AND CONTROLLED-STUDY
T. Francois et al., EFFECT OF INTERPLEURAL ADMINISTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE OR LIDOCAINE ON PAIN AND MORPHINE REQUIREMENT AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH THORACOTOMY - ARANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND AND CONTROLLED-STUDY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 80(4), 1995, pp. 718-723
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of in
terpleural (IP) analgesia with bupivacaine or lidocaine after esophage
al surgery and to measure the plasma concentrations of bupivacaine and
lidocaine after intermittent IP administrations. Two IP catheters wer
e inserted percutaneously in the seventh intercostal space during oper
ation. Patients in the bupivacaine group (Gr B) received 1 mg/kg of 0.
5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200000 in 20 mL of saline 0.9%, pati
ents in the lidocaine group (Gr L) received 3 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine wi
th epinephrine in 20 mL of saline 0.9%, and patients in the placebo gr
oup (Gr P) received 20 mL of saline 0.9% every 4 h during 2 days. Pain
was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) every 4 h at rest (VASR), a
fter a deep breath or cough (VASC), at the thoracotomy (VAST), and at
the laparotomy (VASL). Morphine consumption using a patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) device was recorded. There was no significant differe
nce in the mean VASR, VASC, and VASL scores among the three groups. VA
ST scores were significantly lower in Gr B at 12, 16, 28, and 32 h whe
n compared with Gr P and Gr L (P < 0.05). There was no statistical dif
ference in mean VAST between Gr L and Gr P. Total consumption of morph
ine was lower in Gr B than in Gr P and Gr L (41.2 +/- 13 mg vs 66.1 +/
- 21 mg in Gr P (P < 0.02) and 75.5 +/- 27 mg in Gr L (P < 0.01)), but
were similar in Gr L when compared with Gr P. No patient had any symp
toms suggestive of local anesthetic toxicity despite high peak plasma
concentration (maximum 5.48 mu g/mL and 3.91 mu g/mL for lidocaine and
bupivacaine respectively). We conclude that 1) IP analgesia with bupi
vacaine after esophagectomy reduced morphine requirements due to a dec
rease in the thoracic pain in comparison to a placebo; 2) IP analgesia
with lidocaine was ineffective; and 3) if VAS values in the range 0-3
cm represent adequate analgesia, morphine administration by PCA was n
ot sufficient even in association with bupivacaine IP analgesia.