COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF NISOLDIPINE, METOPROLOL, AND ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE EXERTIONAL ANGINA - A RANDOMIZED, CROSS-OVER, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
H. Ogawa et al., COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF NISOLDIPINE, METOPROLOL, AND ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE EXERTIONAL ANGINA - A RANDOMIZED, CROSS-OVER, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY, International journal of cardiology, 48(2), 1995, pp. 131-137
We evaluated the acute antianginal effect of oral nisoldipine (10 mg),
metoprolol (40 mg), and long-acting isosorbide dinitrate (20 mg) in 1
5 patients with stable exertional angina. The patients performed sympt
om-limited treadmill exercise at 2 h after the administration of place
bo (Placebo stages 1 and 2) and each of the active drugs. After Placeb
o stage 1, the patients were randomized for cross-over evaluation of t
he acute effect of a single oral dose of placebo (Placebo stage 2), ni
soldipine, metoprolol, or long-acting isosorbide dinitrate. All 15 pat
ients developed angina during all of exercise tests and their exercise
tests were terminated at the onset of angina. The time until developm
ent of 0.1 mV ST segment depression was increased by ah three drugs co
mpared to placebo, and it was significantly longer with metoprolol tha
n with isosorbide dinitrate. Similarly, the time to ceasing exercise b
ecause of angina was also prolonged by all three drugs. The exercise t
ime was longer with nisoldipine and metoprolol compared to isosorbide
dinitrate, but there was no significant difference between nisoldipine
and metoprolol. In conclusion, metoprolol and nisoldipine more effect
ively prolonged exercise compared to long-acting isosorbide dinitrate
in patients with stable exertional angina.