Sa. Senseman et al., MONITORING GROUNDWATER FOR PESTICIDES AT SELECTED MIXING LOADING SITES IN ARKANSAS/, Environmental science & technology, 31(1), 1997, pp. 283-288
Groundwater monitoring studies have been conducted in recent years to
survey contamination due to pesticides, yet few have addressed wells w
here pesticides are mixed, loaded, or rinsed. Beginning in 1990, a mon
itoring study conducted over a 2-year period included five collections
at each of 16 mixer/loader locations to assess any pesticide and nitr
ate contamination. At sites in 11 counties, samples for pesticide anal
ysis were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) disks. Samples w
ere screened using gas chromatography-electron capture detection (ECD)
and high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection (LCUV) for 17
pesticides commonly used in Arkansas. Detections were confirmed by ga
s chromatography-mass spectroscopy (MS) or co-chromatography. Fourteen
samples revealed atrazine (1 detection), cyanazine (4), parathion-met
hyl (2), metolachlor (2), norflurazon (1), pendimethalin (1), propanil
(2), or trifluralin (1) at eight locations during the 2-year study. T
wo detections of parathion-methyl and one detection of trifluralin wer
e above the Lifetime Health Advisory Level (LHAL) of 2 mu g L(-1). Dat
a suggested a high correlation between pesticide used and pesticide de
tected at sites sampled. Three wells contained NO3-N concentrations of
10 mg L(-1) or higher, but these did not correlate with pesticide con
centrations. The pesticide's proximity to the wells during mixing, rin
sing, or loading was considered to be a greater influence on temporary
contamination of groundwater than chemical or site-specific character
istics.