Simple and complete models of the classical liver pentose cycle, and a
model of Williams' proposed ''L-type'' pentose cycle, are compared. A
ll extant experimental data on well-oxygenated whole cell systems can
be fitted to the predicted output of the complete classical pentose cy
cle model; however, there are gross discrepancies between key experime
ntal data and Williams' proposed scheme. The complete classical model
allows isotopic reversibility in the non-oxidative segment of the cycl
e, but none of the reversible enzymes are extremely close to isotopic
equilibrium. General approaches are presented to estimate the isotopic
reversibility of most enzymic steps, without requiring isolation of t
he intermediates, present in some cases at very low concentrations. Th
e isotopic reversibility of the non-oxidative pathway causes only mino
r errors in the equations used to estimate liver pentose cycle flux, w
hich were based on simple unidirectional models