Aj. Kposowa et al., REASSESSING THE STRUCTURAL COVARIATES OF VIOLENT AND PROPERTY CRIMES IN THE USA - A COUNTY LEVEL ANALYSIS, British journal of sociology, 46(1), 1995, pp. 79-105
With a large set of US counties, measures for the subculture of violen
ce theory, economic deprivation, economic inequality, social integrati
on and other structural variables are tested on property and violent c
rime indices and homicide rates. Prior research based mainly on small
samples of highly urban environments produced conflicting results, and
was marred by serious methodological and theoretical problems. In add
ition, the previous literature neglected non-urban areas, race and eth
nic correlates of crime, and social integration and other structural f
actors. Employing a variety of research strategies and techniques, we
fail to support the subculture of violence theory as applied to the re
gion of the South or blacks. With an important qualification, we simil
arly fail to obtain support for economic inequality. Support is found
for economic deprivation in the case of homicide and social integratio
n across every dependent variable. Urbanity is the main determinant of
property crime, urbanity and population density are important factors
in violent crime, and poverty, divorce and density figure strongly in
homicide. Poverty and divorce continue to be the strongest determinan
ts of homicide in rural counties, while population mobility and urbani
ty are the strongest factors in both rural violent and property crime.
Unemployment also plays a strong role in rural property crime.