COMPARISON OF ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS DETECTED BY PHARMACY AND MEDICALRECORDS DEPARTMENTS

Citation
Dm. Johnstone et al., COMPARISON OF ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS DETECTED BY PHARMACY AND MEDICALRECORDS DEPARTMENTS, American journal of health-system pharmacy, 52(3), 1995, pp. 297-301
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
10792082
Volume
52
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
297 - 301
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-2082(1995)52:3<297:COADDB>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) detected by the pharmacy and medical rec ords departments of a multispecialty teaching hospital were studied. T he charts of all adult patients who were identified by the pharmacy or medical records departments as having had an ADR and who were dischar ged from the hospital between July and September 1990 were reviewed. D ata on patient demographics and the characteristics of the ADRs were c ollected, and the causality and severity of each ADR were assessed by two pharmacists and one physician. A total of 110 charts representing 117 ADRs were reviewed. Twenty-five (21%) of the ADRs were identified by the pharmacy department and 101 (86%) by the medical records depart ment; 9 (8%) were reported by both departments. The pharmacy and medic al records groups of patients were demographically similar, except tha t the percentage of patients admitted through the emergency room was s ignificantly smaller for the pharmacy department group. ADRs identifie d by the pharmacy were most commonly cutaneous, and those identified b y medical records were most commonly neurologic. For the pharmacy depa rtment, hypersensitivity reactions accounted for the largest number of ADRs, while for medical records the largest number involved abnormal laboratory test values. Anti-infectives were involved in two thirds of the pharmacy-identified ADRs, compared with only a fifth of the ADRs identified by medical records. Mean causality and severity scores did not differ significantly between the groups. The medical records depar tment identified four times as many ADRs as the pharmacy department. O bserved differences in the number and types of reactions, manifestatio ns, patient locations, and suspected drugs probably reflect the differ ent surveillance methods and ADR definitions used by the two departmen ts.