EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGES IN INDIVIDUAL PORCINE CORPORA-LUTEA DURING PROSTAGLANDIN F-2-ALPHA-INDUCED LUTEOLYSIS WITHAN IN-VIVO IMPLANT SYSTEM
Lk. Christenson et al., EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGES IN INDIVIDUAL PORCINE CORPORA-LUTEA DURING PROSTAGLANDIN F-2-ALPHA-INDUCED LUTEOLYSIS WITHAN IN-VIVO IMPLANT SYSTEM, Domestic animal endocrinology, 12(1), 1995, pp. 41-50
To date, no in vitro system has been devised to allow the study of bot
h the functional and the structural regression of luteal cells in resp
onse to prostaglandin (PG) F-2 alpha. This study describes the use of
a novel intraluteal PGF(2 alpha implant system that results in the dea
th of individual corpora lutea (CL), while surrounding CL on the same
ovary remain fully functional. By this technique, it was possible to s
tudy both the functional and the structural regression of individual C
L in vivo, without the confounding effects resulting from the systemic
injection of PGF(2 alpha). Biochemical measurements of individual CL
included progesterone concentration, protein kinase C activity, and di
acylglycerol levels. Structural measurements included luteal weight an
d the protein:DNA ratio, which was used to estimate cell size. Further
, the determination of large luteal cell size was accomplished directl
y via light microscopy. Nonpregnant gilts were injected with 5 mg of e
stradiol benzoate every 12 hr from 8:00 a.m. on Day 11 to 8:00 a.m. on
Day 13 to prevent uterine PGF(2 alpha) secretion. At 7:00 a.m. on Day
13, CL on one ovary were selected at random to receive PGF(2 alpha)-i
mplants (n = 4) or implant material only (n = 4), whereas the remainin
g CL on that ovary served as unimplanted controls. The other ovary was
removed at that point, and the CL on that ovary served as 0-hr contro
ls. Gilts were relaparotomized at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hr after CL implant
ation, the PGF(2 alpha)-implanted ovary was removed, and individual CL
were evaluated. PGF(2 alpha)-implanted CL exhibited a decline (P < 0.
05) in progesterone concentrations at 12 and 24 hr and a decline (P <
0.05) in weight at 24 hr when compared with control CL (implant-only,
unimplanted, and 0-hr control CL). Furthermore, the protein:DNA ratio
was reduced (P < 0.10) in the PGF(2 alpha)-treated CL at 12 and 24 hr.
Moreover, this change in the protein:DNA ratio (cell size) was consis
tent with the reduced diameter (P < 0.05) of the large luteal cell in
the PGF(2 alpha)-treated CL. Protein kinase C activity and diacylglyce
rol concentrations did not change (P > 0.10) and therefore appear to b
e unassociated with either functional or structural changes in the PGF
(2 alpha)-treated CL. Contrary to in vitro culture studies, the result
s of our in vivo study demonstrate no clear role for protein kinase C
in the PGF(2 alpha)-induced luteolytic process. In contrast, our study
does temporally link a decline in luteal progesterone concentrations
with a decrease in the size of large luteal cells.