COMPARISON OF PSEUDOMONAS SPECIES AND APPLICATION TECHNIQUES FOR BIOCONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA STEM ROT OF POINSETTIA

Citation
Dk. Cartwright et Dm. Benson, COMPARISON OF PSEUDOMONAS SPECIES AND APPLICATION TECHNIQUES FOR BIOCONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA STEM ROT OF POINSETTIA, Plant disease, 79(3), 1995, pp. 309-313
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01912917
Volume
79
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
309 - 313
Database
ISI
SICI code
0191-2917(1995)79:3<309:COPSAA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Pseudomonas cepacia (strain 5.5B) was compared with other strains of P . cepacia, P. fluorescens, P. chlororaphis, and P. aureofaciens for bi ocontrol of Rhizoctonia stem rot of poinsettia caused by Rhizoctonia s olani in polyfoam rooting cubes. Over a 2-wk period, complete control (0% infection) of stem rot was achieved with P. cepacia, strain 5.5B. With other strains of P. cepacia, infection ranged from 0 to 93%. Infe ction ranged from 63 to 97% with ail other strains of Pseudomonas spp. Different application methods for delivering strain 5.5B for stem rot control were tested. Rooting cubes soaked with a suspension of strain 5.5B or cubes soaked with a bacterial suspension followed by a bacter ial spray over-the-top of cuttings (at day 0) were the most effective application methods. Cubes soaked with water followed by a bacterial s pray over-the-top of the cuttings in cubes controlled (P = 0.05) stem rot compared with the control. Three spray applications of P. cepacia strain 5.5B to cuttings during a 2-wk period were more effective than either one or two bacterial sprays in control of Rhizoctonia stem rot. Spraying poinsettia stock plants with a suspension of strain 5.5B pri or to taking cuttings, or dipping cutting stems in a bacterial suspens ion prior to placing cuttings in cubes, provided no stem rot control.