J. Astbury et al., BIRTH EVENTS, BIRTH EXPERIENCES AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCES IN POSTNATAL DEPRESSION, Australian journal of public health, 18(2), 1994, pp. 176-184
A postal survey of all women who gave birth in Victoria in one week in
1989 was used to assess the contribution of birth events, satisfactio
n with care and social differences to depression after birth. The ques
tionnaire was mailed to women eight to nine months after birth. The su
rvey response was 71.4 per cent (790/1107) with underrepresentation of
young women, single women and women of non-English-speaking backgroun
d. Assessment of depression was made using the Edinburgh Postnatal Dep
ression Scale, with a score of 13 or more indicating probable clinical
depression. The point prevalence of depression was 15.4 per cent (95
per cent confidence interval 12.8 to 18.0). In the final logistic mode
l two factors were associated with lower odds of depression: nonmetrop
olitan residence and maternal age over 34. Factors associated with inc
reased odds of depression in the model were having a first child over
the age of 34, assisted delivery (caesarean, forceps, vacuum extractio
n), bottle feeding, dissatisfaction with antenatal care, having unwant
ed people present at the birth and lacking confidence to look after th
e baby at the time of leaving hospital. When those factors were taken
into account, being unmarried, being born overseas of non-English-spea
king background, being dissatisfied with care in labour and after birt
h, and not having an active say in decision making, all of which were
significantly associated with depression in univariate analyses, did n
ot make any additional contribution to the model.