MASS CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION - SOME ETHICAL DOUBTS FOR PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE WORKERS

Citation
D. Pilgrim et A. Rogers, MASS CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION - SOME ETHICAL DOUBTS FOR PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE WORKERS, Nursing ethics, 2(1), 1995, pp. 63-70
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Nursing
Journal title
ISSN journal
09697330
Volume
2
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
63 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0969-7330(1995)2:1<63:MCI-SE>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The mass childhood immunization programme has traditionally been viewe d as a safe and effective preventative measure by health promoters, pr imary health care professionals and governments. This consensus has me ant that immunization has rarely been viewed as ethically problematic. A number of recent changes in the context of the delivery of health c are, particularly the emphasis on consumerism and the effect of the ma rketization of services, makes timely an examination of ethical, socia l and political issues. This article examines four main groups for pro blematizing the mass childhood immunization programme. These are: clin ical research evidence about the safety and efficacy of vaccines; the masking of wider social and political determinants of ill health; the contradictory strictures about collective and individual rights in rel ation to immunization; and the uniqueness of childhood immunization as a physical intrusion into a healthy body. The implications of these e thical issues are discussed in relation to informed consent and the ne ed for a 'greenfield' review that includes the views of dissenting par ents, lawyers and moral philosophers, as well as health professionals.