Sj. Simske et R. Sachdeva, CRANIAL BONE APPOSITION AND INGROWTH IN A POROUS NICKEL-TITANIUM IMPLANT, Journal of biomedical materials research, 29(4), 1995, pp. 527-533
A 5 x 5 x 1-mm uncoated porous nickel-titanium (nitinol) implant was p
laced 4 mm to either side of the midsection of the frontal bone and 4
mm anterior to the coronal suture of the cranial bone of New Zealand W
hite rabbits. In the other frontal location, a 5 x 5 x 1-mm coralline
hydroxyapatite (HA) (Interpore 200, a well-known craniofacial implant
material) implant was fitted. Rabbits were killed at each of three pos
tsurgical intervals (2, 6, and 12 weeks), and the implants were evalua
ted for gross biocompatibility, bony contact, and ingrowth. No adjacen
t macrophage cells were observed for either implant type, and overlayi
ng soft tissues and connective tissues readily adhered to the implants
even after 2 weeks. Both materials made bone contact with the surroun
ding cranial hard tissue, and percent ingrowth increased with surgical
recovery time. Measurements of microhardness and bone histologic para
meters indicated that bone in contact with and grown into the implants
was similar in properties to the surrounding cranial bone. Porous nit
inol implants therefore appear to allow for significant cranial bone i
ngrowth after as few as 12 weeks, and thus nitinol appears to be suita
ble for craniofacial applications. Compared to HA, the nitinol implant
s demonstrated a trend for less total apposition and more total ingrow
th after 6 and 12 weeks of implantation. (C) 1995 John Wiley and Sons,
Inc.