ACTIVATING AND INACTIVATING MUTATIONS IN N-TERMINAL AND C-TERMINAL I3LOOP JUNCTIONS OF MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE HM1 RECEPTORS

Citation
P. Hogger et al., ACTIVATING AND INACTIVATING MUTATIONS IN N-TERMINAL AND C-TERMINAL I3LOOP JUNCTIONS OF MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE HM1 RECEPTORS, The Journal of biological chemistry, 270(13), 1995, pp. 7405-7410
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
ISSN journal
00219258
Volume
270
Issue
13
Year of publication
1995
Pages
7405 - 7410
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9258(1995)270:13<7405:AAIMIN>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The N- and C-terminal junctions of the third intracellular loop (i3) o f G protein coupled receptors play a role in the coupling process, We had previously constructed two triple point alanine mutants of the i3 junction of the muscarinic Hm1 receptor, W209A/I211A/Y212A and E360A/K 362A/T366A, which are defective in mediating carbachol stimulation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover (Moro, O., Lameh, J., Hogger, P., a nd Sadee, W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22273-22276). Each of the corr esponding six single point mutations were constructed to determine res idues crucial to receptor coupling. Mutants W209A and T366A were simil ar to or only slightly less effective than wild type Hm1 in stimulatin g PI turnover. In the N-terminal junction, I211A and Y212A were defect ive in coupling, and I211A was even more defective than the correspond ing triple mutant, Therefore, the triple mutation compensated at least partially for the effect of these two single point mutations. In the C-terminal i3 loop junction, mutant K362A was again more strongly defe ctive than the corresponding triple mutant, In contrast, mutation E360 A was found to be activating, leading to elevated PI turnover in the a bsence of agonist and sensitization toward carbachol activation. Activ ating mutations in the C terminal i3 loop junction have been reported previously for the adrenergic receptors, but E360A represents the firs t muscarinic receptor with substantial basal activity, The effects of the single point mutations observed in this study were not readily pre dictable from similar mutations from closely related G protein-coupled receptors despite sequence conservation in the is loop junctions. Our results caution against defining precise coupling domains in these re gions by mutagenesis results.