Jm. Johnson et al., SKIN OF THE DORSAL ASPECT OF HUMAN HANDS AND FINGERS POSSESSES AN ACTIVE VASODILATOR SYSTEM, Journal of applied physiology, 78(3), 1995, pp. 948-954
To test for an active vasodilator system in human hand and finger skin
, seven subjects had a small area of dorsal hand, palm, or dorsal fing
er pretreated with bretylium (BT) to block adrenergic vasoconstriction
. Skin blood flow was monitored at a BT-treated site, a comparable unt
reated site, and the forearm by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Cutaneous vas
cular conductance (CVC) was evaluated from the ratio of blood flow to
arterial pressure. Body cooling, to evaluate vasoconstrictor system bl
ockade, caused CVC at untreated sites of forearm, palm, dorsal hand, a
nd dorsal finger to fall by 45 +/- 4, 85 +/- 5, 51 +/- 9, and 63 +/- 7
%, respectively (all P < 0.05). At BT-treated sites of palm, dorsal ha
nd, and dorsal finger, reductions in CVC were only 13 +/- 3, 2 +/- 18,
and 13 +/- 4%, respectively (dorsal hand not significant, others P <
0.05). With body heating, increases in CVC at untreated sites of forea
rm, palm, dorsal hand, and dorsal finger were 881 +/- 165, 779 +/- 368
, 423 +/- 115, and 1,430 +/- 716%, respectively (all P < 0.05). At BT-
treated sites of palm, dorsal hand, and dorsal finger, increases were
35 +/- 15, 342 +/- 107, and 343 +/- 34%, respectively (palm not signif
icant, others P < 0.05). Increased CVC at the palm began after 1.2 +/-
0.2 min of heating, significantly earlier than forearm (11.8 +/- 2.5
min), dorsal hand (16.4 +/- 3.4 min), or dorsal finger (15.6 +/- 3.6 m
in), which did not differ significantly from one another. These findin
gs indicate that, unlike the traditional description, the dorsal hand
and fingers have an active vasodilator system. We found no evidence fo
r such a system in palmar skin.