This paper examines the effects of judgemental adjustments on the rati
onality of macroeconomic forecasts. Published forecasts based on large
-scale models are rarely purely model-based, but often include extensi
ve adjustments. Forecasters' adjustments tend to improve forecast accu
racy, but there is no evidence of their impact on the rationality of f
orecasts. Using series of revisions to forecasts we find little eviden
ce that published forecasts are excessively smooth in the Nordhaus (19
87) sense, but intercept corrections do appear to reduce the variation
over time in purely model-based forecasts and to alter the underlying
output/inflation trade-off implicit in the model.