Ma. Benninga et al., DEFECATION DISORDERS IN CHILDREN, COLONIC TRANSIT-TIME VERSUS THE BARR-SCORE, European journal of pediatrics, 154(4), 1995, pp. 277-284
It is still unclear how to evaluate the existence of faecal retention
or impaction in children with defaecation disorders. To objectivate th
e presence and degree of constipation we measured segmental and total
colonic transit times (CTT) using radio-opaque markers in 211 constipa
ted children. On clinical grounds, patients (median age 8 years (5-14
years)) could be divided into three groups; constipation, isolated enc
opresis/soiling and recurrent abdominal pain. Barr-scores, a method fo
r assessment of stool retention using plain abdominal radiographs, wer
e obtained in the first 101 patients, for comparison with CTT measurem
ents as to the clinical outcome. Of the children with constipation, 48
% showed significantly prolonged total and segmental CTT. Surprisingly
91% and 91%, respectively, of the encopresis/soiling and recurrent ab
dominal pain children had a total CTT within normal limits, suggesting
that no motility disorder was present. Prolonged CTT through all segm
ents, known as colonic inertia, was found in the constipation group on
ly. Based on significant differences in clinical presentation, CTT and
colonic transit patterns, encopresis/ soiling children formed a separ
ate entity among children with defaecation disorders, compared to chil
dren with constipation. Recurrent abdominal pain in children was in th
e great majority, not related to-constipation. Barr-scores were poorly
reproducible, with low inter-and intra-observer reliability. This is
the first study which shows that clinical differences in constipated c
hildren are associated with different colonic transit patterns. The us
efulness of CTT measurements lies in the objectivation of complaints a
nd the discrimination of certain transit patterns. Conclusion Abdomina
l radiographs, even when assessed with the Barr-score proved unreliabl
e in diagnosing constipation. Marker studies should be performed in th
e second stage of evaluation after failure of initial therapy.