Eighteen criticisms of the ,,Five Factor Model'' of personality (FFM)
are indicated : there is too much variation for comfort in the number
and the nature of the personality dimensions that are currently recogn
ized by researchers, whether in ,,lexical'' studies or in questionnair
e data. It is suggested that there are actually six main dimensions of
normally-distributed human psychological difference; and that each of
the six psychometric dimensions is connected with a particular underl
ying difference in both ability and emotion. A comprehensive scheme re
presenting major dimensions of personality, ability and emotion is out
lined. However, psychometric fusion sometimes occurs within two pairs
of the Comprehensive 6 dimensions - when testing methods are less sens
itive or when testees are of lower sophistication or general intellige
nce (g); such lack of differentiation results in only four or five dim
ensions being seen. Additionally, three of the six dimensions (extrave
rsion, neuroticism and conscientiousness) are particularly easily foun
d in conventional questionnaire studies. These three resemble the thre
e most familiar personality concepts of Freud (id, ego, superego) and
Eysenck (Extraversion, Neuroticism, Psychoticism); anyhow, a ,,Freudia
n'' combination of short yet reliable ipsative versions of them yields
correlations with sexual permissiveness and militarism/punitiveness.
Like g itself, other dimensions of personality crystallize into differ
ences in attainment and into attitudes regarding sex and aggression.