Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the
UK. An effective national screening programme is urgently required to
reduce the substantial morbidity and mortality from the disease. The
success of any screening programme will depend on the screening test d
etecting early Dukes's A carcinomas and adenomatous polyps. Prognosis
is directly related to tumour staging and a proportion of carcinomas a
re thought to arise from polyps. Two screening methods exist - faecal
occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. Large trials of faecal occult
blood testing show that it detects more early lesions than in patients
presenting with symptoms, but whether this reduces mortality is not y
et confirmed and lack of sensitivity for cancers and polyps may ultima
tely limits its usefulness. The role of sigmoidoscopy in screening, pa
rticularly flexible sigmoidoscopy, has not been fully investigated. Fl
exible sigmoidoscopy has a greater sensitivity for distal lesions than
stool testing and a randomised controlled trial of its efficacy is pl
anned in Britain. Compliance with screening is essential to ensure its
cost effectiveness in both health and economic terms. Large trials of
faecal occult blood testing conducted over several years achieved com
pliance rates in excess of 60%, although in smaller studies these are
often much less. Women frequently participate more than men. There are
many reasons for noncompliance including lack of appreciation of the
concept of asymptomatic illness and fear of the screening tests and ca
ncer itself. Colorectal cancer screening is relatively cheap compared
with breast and cervical cancer screening. Provisional cost estimates
suggest that the amount spent to detect or prevent cancer by screening
is similar to the amount required to treat a symptomatic patient.