A KINETIC-MODEL FOR THE METHANOL HIGHER ALCOHOL SYNTHESIS FROM CO CO2/H-2 OVER CU/ZNO-BASED CATALYSTS INCLUDING SIMULTANEOUS FORMATION OF METHYL-ESTERS AND HYDROCARBONS/

Citation
Bb. Breman et al., A KINETIC-MODEL FOR THE METHANOL HIGHER ALCOHOL SYNTHESIS FROM CO CO2/H-2 OVER CU/ZNO-BASED CATALYSTS INCLUDING SIMULTANEOUS FORMATION OF METHYL-ESTERS AND HYDROCARBONS/, Chemical Engineering Science, 49(24A), 1994, pp. 4409-4428
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Chemical
ISSN journal
00092509
Volume
49
Issue
24A
Year of publication
1994
Pages
4409 - 4428
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-2509(1994)49:24A<4409:AKFTMH>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The kinetics of the conversion of syngas (CO/CO2/H-2) to a methanol-hi gher alcohol mixture over a Cs-Cu/ZnO/Al2O3, catalyst were measured at a pressure of 5-100 bar, a temperature of 200-300 degrees C, a H-2/CO ratio in the feed of 0.66-4.37, a mole fraction of CO2 in the feed of 0-0.114 and a space velocity of 0.082 x 10(-3) - 2.56 x 10(-3) nm(3) s(-1) kg(cat)(-1),. Methanol was the major product and higher linear 1 -alcohols (1 < n less than or equal to 7), higher branched 2-methyl-1- alcohols (4 less than or equal to n less than or equal to 9), methyl e sters (2 less than or equal to n less than or equal to 4), dimethyl et her, paraffins(1 less than or equal to n less than or equal to 8), 2-m ethyl-paraffins (4 less than or equal to n less than or equal to 8), C O2 and H2O were analysed as significantly present secondary products. The best model available from literature predicts the obtained alcohol product distributions reasonably accurately up to (2-methyl-)1-pentan ol inclusive whereafter the predictions fail completely. The predictio ns of the methyl eaters from this model are reasonable but could be ve rified up to methyl propionate inclusive only. A new model is presente d in this study, which is significantly more accurate than all existin g models and gives accurate predictions over the entire carbon number range for both the alcohols and the methyl esters with average relativ e deviations of 6.7% and 4.1%, respectively. In contrast to all models from the literature, this model also incorporated the simultaneous hy drocarbon formation accurately with an average relative deviation of 9 .8%. A thorough residual analysis delivers further support for the mod el adequacy. Finally, the alcohol and methyl ester product distributio ns from the literature proved to be reasonably described by this new m odel with average relative deviations of 22.9% and 14.1%, respectively .