Dd. Addie et al., RISK OF FELINE INFECTIOUS PERITONITIS IN CATS NATURALLY INFECTED WITHFELINE CORONAVIRUS, American journal of veterinary research, 56(4), 1995, pp. 429-434
A longitudinal survey of 820 cats in 73 households was conducted over
a period of 6 years to establish the fate of pet cats that were seropo
sitive after natural exposure to feline coronavirus (FCoV). In particu
lar, their risk of developing feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) was
determined. The seropositive cats were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: cats
from households in which FIP had recently been diagnosed; cats from h
ouseholds in which FIP had not been diagnosed, but from which kittens
had been relocated and subsequently died of FIP; and cats from househo
lds in which FIP had not been diagnosed. Cats in the first group were
not at greater risk of developing FIP than were cats in the other 2 gr
oups. Consequently, any household in which seropositive cats live must
be considered a potential source of FCoV that can cause FIP. There wa
s no evidence, that the enhanced disease, which has been described aft
er experimentally induced infection of seropositive cats, exists in na
ture. Thus, analysis of the survival of the seropositive cats over per
iods of up to 36 months indicated that their risk of developing FLP de
creased with time, suggesting the development of immunity rather than
increased susceptibility to disease. In addition, of 56 cats deemed to
have been naturally reinfected because their anti-FCoV antibody titer
s decreased and subsequently increased, only 3 developed np.