Gt. Budd et al., SHORT-COURSE FAC-M VERSUS 1 YEAR OF CMFVP IN NODE-POSITIVE, HORMONE RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER - AN INTERGROUP STUDY, Journal of clinical oncology, 13(4), 1995, pp. 831-839
Purpose: To compare 1 year of therapy with continuous cyclophosphamide
, methotrexate, fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine, and prednisone (CMFV
P) with a short course of treatment with a doxorubicin-based regimen i
n the postsurgical adjvvant treatment of patients with hormone recepto
r-negative, node-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Five-hu
ndred thirty-one eligible women with hormone receptor-negative, node-p
ositive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 1 year of ther
apy with CMFVP or 20 weeks of therapy with four 5-week courses of trea
tment with 5-FU, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate (FAC-
M).Results: At a median follow-up time of 4.9 years, the two treatment
arms cannot be demonstrated to be different with respect to overall s
urvival (stratified log-rank, P = .27). The 5-year survival rate is 64
% on the CMFVP arm and 61% on the FAC-M arm. CMFVP produces marginally
superior disease-free survival (P = .06), The estimated 5-year diseas
e-free survival rate is 55% for patients treated with CMFVP as opposed
to 50% for patients treated with FAC-M. Conclusion: Neither regimen w
as shown to be superior in terms of overall survival. Because the dise
ase-free survival produced by CMFVP is marginally superior to that pro
duced by FAC-M, we do not recommend FAC-M for further investigation or
for routine use. Possible implications of this study are discussed in
the context of other adjuvant chemotherapy trials. J Clin Oncol 33:83
1-839. (C) 1995 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.