M. Heras et al., HIGH-RISK OF THROMBOEMBOLI EARLY AFTER BIOPROSTHETIC CARDIAC-VALVE REPLACEMENT, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(5), 1995, pp. 1111-1119
Objectives. We studied the rate of thromboembolism in patients undergo
ing bioprosthetic replacement of the aortic or mitral valve, or bath,
at serial intervals after operation and the effects of anticoagulant o
r antiplatelet treatment and risk factors. Background. Thromboembolism
appears to occur early after operation, but the incidence, timing and
risk factors for thromboembolism and the role, timing, adequacy, effe
ctiveness, duration and risk of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agent
s are uncertain. Methods. The rate of thromboembolism was studied at t
hree time intervals after operation (1 to 10, 11 to 90 and >90 days) i
n 816 patients who underwent bioprosthetic replacement of the aortic o
r mitral valve, or both, at the Mayo Clinic from January 1975 to Decem
ber 1982. The effect of antithrombotic therapy (warfarin, aspirin or d
ipyridamole, alone or in combination) was evaluated. Results. Median f
ollow-up of surviving patients was 8.6 years. The rate of thromboembol
ism (%/year) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) at each time interval
after operation (1 to 10, 11 to 90 and >90 days) for mitral valve repl
acement (55%, 10% and 2.4%/year, respectively) and over the first time
interval for aortic valve replacement (41%, 3.6% and 1.9%/year, respe
ctively). During the first 10 days, 52% to 70% of prothrombin time rat
ios were low (<1.5 x control). Patients with mitral valve replacement
who received anticoagulation had a lower rate of thromboembolism for t
he entire follow-up period (2.5%/year with vs. 3.9%/year without antic
oagulation, p = 0.05). Of 112 patients with a first thrombo embolic ep
isode, permanent disability occurred in 38% and death in 4%. Risk fact
ors for emboli were lack of anticoagulation, mitral valve location, hi
story of thromboembolism and increasing age. Only 10% of aortic, 44% o
f mitral and 17% of double valve recipients had anticoagulation at the
time of an event. Patients with bleeding episodes (2.3%/year) were ol
der and usually underwent anticoagulation. Blood transfusions were req
uired in 60 of 111 patients (1.2%/year), and 13 patients (0.3%/year) d
ied. Conclusions. Thromboembolic risk was especially high for aortic a
nd mitral valve replacement for 90 days after operation, and overall w
as increased with lack of anticoagulation, mitral valve location, prev
ious thromboembolism and increasing age. Anticoagulation reduced throm
boemboli and appears to be indicated in all patients as early as possi
ble for 3 months and thereafter in those with risk factors, but needs
prospective testing.