H. Krakauer et al., THE RELATIONSHIP OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES TO STATUS AS A MEDICARE-APPROVED HEART-TRANSPLANT CENTER, Transplantation, 59(6), 1995, pp. 840-846
This study reports the evaluation of the validity and utility of the M
edicare heart transplant center selection process, as outlined in its
1986 Heart Coverage Regulations. A total of 9401 heart transplants per
formed in the U.S. between 1986 and 1991 mere analyzed. The outcomes a
ssessed were mortality and the occurrence of infection during the hosp
ital stay. Outcomes experienced by centers with and without Medicare a
pproval were compared directly and following adjustment for patient ri
sk factors. Patients at centers that satisfied the Medicare criteria e
xperienced lower mortality. The risk-adjusted hazard ratio for death o
ver the five years of observation was 0.874 (P=0.005). The probability
of death following a transplant at a Medicare-approved center was 7.0
+/-0.4% at 30 days and 16.2+/-0.6% at one year, and 9.2+/-0.4% and 19.
2+/-0.6%, respectively, at centers without Medicare approval (P=0.001)
The difference appeared to be principally associated with death within
30 days of admission due to nonspecific graft failure. The posttransp
lant infection rate at Medicare-approved centers was 0.743 (P<0.001) b
ut this result is strongly confounded with differences in reporting pa
tterns of the two types of centers. Criteria used by HCFA identify med
ical centers where outcomes of heart transplantation, as measured by m
ortality, are superior. This difference is established early, persists
over time, and is not attributable to the numerous risk factors consi
dered in our models. Overall, the results of the present study suggest
that ''centers of excellence'' can be identified through the evaluati
on of center characteristics and outcomes, and that this approach chos
en by HCFA may have broad health care systems applications.