Mjc. Hessing et al., INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN CELL-MEDIATED AND HUMORAL IMMUNITY IN PIGS, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 45(1-2), 1995, pp. 97-113
Previous experiments displayed consistent individual behavioural diffe
rences in pigs. Some showed a more active behavioural response (aggres
sive and resistant; so-called A/R pigs), others a more passive behavio
ural response (non-aggressive and non-resistant; so-called NA/NR pigs)
. Moreover, these behavioural coping strategies were associated with d
ifferent behavioural, physiological and endocrine responses under stre
ss conditions. In the present study we selected 32 A/R and 32 NA/NR in
dividuals and tested their immune reactivity in reaction to stress usi
ng several cell-mediated (CMI) and humoral immunological tests. Active
A/R pigs had a higher in vivo and in vitro CMI to nonspecific and spe
cific antigens, while after stress CMI reduced more in A/R than in NA/
NR pigs. In contrast, humoral immunity was highest in NA/NR pigs. Furt
hermore, some serologically typed swine lymphocyte antigen (SLA) class
I haplotypes were not equally distributed between A/R and NA/NR pigs.
In general, these findings show that measurement of immune reactivity
is an important tool to define how animals cope with environmental de
mands.