Rc. Price et al., RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE CYTOTOXIC EFFECTS OF RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASES AND RADIATION ON MAMMALIAN-CELLS, International journal of radiation biology, 67(3), 1995, pp. 327-334
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging","Nuclear Sciences & Tecnology
Wild-type Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, a radiosensitive mutant C
HO line (xrs6), and two human cervical carcinoma cell lines, MS751 and
ME180, differ in sensitivity to ionizing radiation with surviving fra
ctions at 2 Gy (SF2) of 0.84, 0.06, 0.90 and 0.24 respectively. Restri
ction endonucleases (REs) were introduced into the cells by treatment
with streptolysin O (SLO) and the effects of this on clonogenic cell s
urvival were compared. A comparison was made of REs inducing either bl
unt- (AluI) or cohesive-ended (Sau3AI) double-strand breaks. Whilst MS
751 cells were resistant to the effects of both REs, AluI caused signi
ficantly greater cell killing than Sau3AI in the other three lines (P
< 0.05 for all). Both ME180 and xrs6 were significantly more sensitive
to REs than their radioresistant counterparts, MS751 and CHO (P < 0.0
5 for both). In order to investigate the effect of DNA methylation on
dsb induction, the isoschizomers MspI and HpaII (cohesive-ended dsb in
ducers) were introduced into the cell lines. Both REs recognize the sa
me sequence but HpaII: cannot cleave if the internal cytosine is methy
lated. MS751 was also resistant to the effects of both of these enzyme
s and MspI was more cytotoxic than HpaII in the other three lines (p <
0.03 for all). The differential sensitivity to the two REs was more m
arked in the radiosensitive cell lines, suggesting that there may be a
greater degree of DNA methylation in radiosensitive cells. The variat
ion in sensitivities to REs between the cell lines could not be explai
ned in terms of differences in cell poration following SLO treatment b
ecause, although MS75 1 was resistant to SLO (25% of cells porated), t
he other three lines showed the same level of cell poration (98% of ce
lls). With these four cell lines, there was a significant correlation
between sensitivity to RE and radiosensitivity for AluI, SauSAI and Ms
pI but not for HpaII.