J. Clemens et al., GIBBERELLINS AND BUD BREAK, VEGETATIVE SHOOT GROWTH AND FLOWERING IN METROSIDEROS-COLLINA CV TAHITI, Plant growth regulation, 16(2), 1995, pp. 161-171
Applications of the growth promotive gibberellins (GAs) GA(4) and 2,2-
dimethyl GA(4), and of C-16,17 endo-dihydro GA(5), which is known to p
romote flowering while inhibiting stem growth in the long-day grass Lo
lium temulentum, were made to micropropagated plants of Metrosideros c
ollina cv. Tahiti, a highly ornamental cultivar with an intermittent f
lowering pattern. Gibberellin A(4) and 2,2-dimethyl GA(4) stimulated v
egetative growth both in elongating shoots, and internodes of shoots d
eveloping from buds that were quiescent at the time of GA application.
Abscission of the apices of expanding shoots, a feature of mature Met
rosideros plants, was inhibited by these GAs, the rejuvenation of micr
opropagated plantlets being enhanced. However, C-16,17 endo-dihydro GA
(5) differed from GA(4) and 2,2-dimethyl GA(4) by having no promotive
effects on vegetative growth, and no inhibition of apical abscission.
Notwithstanding this contrasting effect on vegetative growth, high dos
es of GA(4) or C-16,17 endo-dihydro GA(5) similarly reduced flowering
on shoots to which either GA was applied. Reduced flowering in respons
e to applied GAs is common in many woody angiosperms, and in this inst
ance was probably the combined result of abortion of developing floral
structures in quiescent buds, and a preferential inhibition of bud br
eak for floral buds relative to vegetative buds, particularly by GA(4)
. Finally, both C-16,17 endo-dihydro GAs and GA(4) strongly inhibited
bud break in this woody angiosperm, although GA(4) could initially sti
mulate bud break when applied to vegetative buds close to the expansio
n stage. The above findings, in tote, highlight the sensitivity of Met
rosideros to both classes of GA in a variety of growth and development
processes.