Ae. Pottieger et al., DRUG-USE PATTERNS OF ADULT CRACK USERS IN STREET VERSUS RESIDENTIAL-TREATMENT SAMPLES, Journal of psychoactive drugs, 27(1), 1995, pp. 27-38
Studies of treatment samples have long been the primary source of gene
ralizations about drug users, especially for drugs with very low preva
lence rates in the general population, such as heroin and crack. Sampl
e selection bias is briefly discussed, and a 1988-1990 study of 699 co
caine users in Miami is described. The drug patterns of the 387 adult
crack users interviewed in that study are compared by sample type-resi
dential treatment versus street, controlling for gender. Some similari
ties between sample types were found, but differences were more numero
us. Notably, street respondents started cocaine at a younger age; had
used crack regularly for a longer period of time; were more likely to
have used pills, heroin, and freebase cocaine; were much more likely t
o be using crack (but only crack) on a daily basis; and were more like
ly to obtain crack by being paid in it, especially for drug dealing. T
reatment respondents were more likely to use multiple forms of cocaine
, to use cocaine in a binge pattern and with high per-day dosages, and
to pay for cocaine with cash they got from a job.