The determination of oil and gas reserve volumes and their values is s
ubject both to uncertainty in the parameters used to make the estimate
s and to the biases of individuals and organizations making and using
the estimates. The traditional reserve classification, into Proved, Pr
obable and Possible categories, although generally presented as determ
inistic, implicitly recognizes the stochastic nature of the estimation
process. Practical considerations of time and Limited knowledge of th
e techniques tend to limit the use of stochastic methods. Even when de
terministic methods are used, however, uncertainty remains and the imp
lications of this uncertainty should be understood. Common reserve est
imation methods aim for a high degree of certainty in proved reserves
estimates, but the usual approach often yields a value of lower probab
ility. A misunderstanding of the fundamental, and unavoidable, stochas
tic nature of oil and gas reserve estimation may be trivial at the lev
el of an individual property, but can have a significant impact when r
eserves are aggregated. Uncertainty cannot be avoided; it can be manag
ed, but only when it is recognized and understood.