M. Darmiento et al., ELECTIVE CONSERVATIVE SURGERY FOR RENAL-CARCINOMA VERSUS RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, British Journal of Urology, 79(1), 1997, pp. 15-19
Objective To identify criteria with which to select candidates for con
servative nephrectomy, and to compare the results of radical and conse
rvative nephrectomy in two homogeneous groups of patients with renal c
arcinoma, in a prospective study. Patients and methods Forty patients
(27 men and 13 women, mean age 49.9 years, range 23-76) with renal car
cinoma (T1-T2 NOMO, <4 cm in diameter) were enrolled in the study betw
een 1988 and 1993 and followed for a maximum of 98 months (mean 70.1),
The patients were divided into two groups: Group A comprised 19 patie
nts (mean age 51.4, so 13.7 years, mean tumour size 3.34, SD 0.64 cm)
who underwent partial nephrectomy; Group B comprised 21 patients (mean
age 45.7, SD 14.7 pears, mean tumour size 3.21, SD 0.56 cm) who were
selected for radical nephrectomy, The survival and progression of dise
ase were assessed. Results Survival did not differ between the groups;
one patient from each group died from distant metastases, There were
no cases of local recurrence and multifocal neoplastic lesions were fo
und in one patient during surgery, Conclusion This prospective study c
onfirms the results of retrospective studies that conservative surgery
is as effective as radical surgery for renal carcinoma; however, its
clinical application is limited by the risk that the renal carcinoma i
s multifocal.