ANALYTIC ETHNOGRAPHY - FEATURES, FAILINGS, AND FUTURES

Authors
Citation
J. Lofland, ANALYTIC ETHNOGRAPHY - FEATURES, FAILINGS, AND FUTURES, Journal of contemporary ethnography, 24(1), 1995, pp. 30-67
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology,"Urban Studies
ISSN journal
08912416
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
30 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
0891-2416(1995)24:1<30:AE-FFA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The research strategy sometimes termed analytic ethnography has been a prominent-or even the dominant-form of qualitative inquiry for some d ecades. Lacking challenge by other qualitative approaches, however, th ere has been little need to articulate it as a distinctive strategy of qualitative research. The approach having now been challenged, it has become necessary clearly to adduce its defining features as a step in the larger task of undertaking accurate and systematic comparisons of diverse qualitative research strategies. I here attempt this first st ep by delineating seven features or tendencies that, in composite, con stitute analytic ethnography. Following this articulation, I suggest s ome of analytic ethnography's successes and failures as a strategy of social research and I speculate about its future.