Objective: In light of continuing controversies concerning the DSM-III
-R system for diagnosing personality disorders, their construct validi
ty, and the assignment of disorders to a particular axis, the authors
studied patterns of axis I-axis II comorbidity. Method: Semistructured
interviews were used to assess axis I and axis II disorders in 200 in
patients and outpatients. Odds ratios were calculated to determine sig
nificant comorbidity between classes of current axis I disorders and a
xis II personality disorders diagnosed according to two methods and de
fined at two diagnostic thresholds. Distributions of personality disor
der traits were also compared in patients with and without axis I diso
rders. Results: Significantly elevated odds ratios were found for co-o
ccurrence of current mood disorders with avoidant and dependent person
ality disorders; anxiety disorders with borderline, avoidant, and depe
ndent personality disorders; psychotic disorders with schizotypal, bor
derline, and dependent personality disorders; psychoactive substance u
se disorders with borderline and histrionic personality disorders; and
eating disorders with schizotypal, borderline, and avoidant personali
ty disorders. These results held when conservative and liberal definit
ions of personality disorders were used. Nonspecific axis I and axis I
I associations were confirmed for distributions of personality disorde
r traits. Conclusions: Significant associations occurred between most
axis I classes of disorders and axis II disorders and traits in more t
han one cluster. All axis I classes of disorders except mood disorders
co-occurred with borderline personality disorder; however, patients w
ith mood disorders had elevated levels of borderline traits. When any
personality disorder was present, there were significant odds that a m
ood, anxiety, psychotic, or eating disorder would also be present; psy
choactive substance use disorders, in contrast, significantly co-occur
red with borderline and histrionic personality disorders.