A. Masago et al., PITUITARY APOPLEXY AFTER PITUITARY-FUNCTION TEST - A REPORT OF 2 CASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, Surgical neurology, 43(2), 1995, pp. 158-164
BACKGROUND Although most of pituitary apoplexy occur spontaneously, so
me precipitating factors have been reported. We experienced two cases
of pituitary apoplexy after a pituitary function test. METHODS In orde
r to clarify the causal relation between the pituitary function test a
nd apoplexy, we presented our two cases and reviewed 20 cases in the l
iterature. RESULTS (Case 1) A 48-year-old man with a pituitary macroad
enoma received an injection of 500 mu g thyrotropin-releasing hormone
(TRH), 100 mu g gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and 0.1U/kg ins
ulin as a preoperative test of pituitary function. Fifteen minutes lat
er, he complained of diminished vision and headache. (Case 2) A 54-yea
r-old man with a large cystic adenoma had an administration of 500 mu
g TRH and 100 mu g GnRH. Ten minutes later, he complained of blurring
of his left eye and headache. Although, in both cases, CT scans showed
neither intratumoral hemorrhage nor infarction, the surgical specimen
showed necrotic and hemorrhagic adenoma. The patients made excellent
clinical recoveries after surgical decompression. Twenty-two reports i
ncluding our two cases were reviewed. In 15 cases (68%), TRH was assoc
iated with apoplectic events and seemed to be the agent most likely to
have an etiologic role because of its vasoactive properties. Eighteen
patients (82%) had pituitary macroadenomas with suprasellar extension
. In 72% of 18 surgical cases, some recovery of visual function was ob
tained. CONCLUSIONS An apparent relationship between the test and the
apoplectic events raises the possibility of the development of pituita
ry apoplexy after a pituitary function test. Unless there is a specifi
c indication, pituitary function test should be avoided especially in
patients with a large pituitary tumor.