In a letter-naming task, a letter will be named more slowly if it was
a distractor on the previous trial. This negative priming effect has b
een instrumental in renewed interest in inhibition. The present resear
ch explored whether inhibition is a result of controlled attention. Wh
en the naming task was performed under a mental work load, negative pr
iming was diminished as work load increased. This finding suggests tha
t inhibition is a product of controlled resources and that group diffe
rences in inhibition may result from differences in controlled attenti
onal resources, not from inefficient inhibitory mechanisms.