H. Elrefaey et al., INDUCTION OF ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE (RU-486) AND ORAL OR VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL, The New England journal of medicine, 332(15), 1995, pp. 983-987
Background. Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully perfo
rmed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin a
nalogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral
with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E(1), analogue misopr
ostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mif
epristone. Methods. The study population consisted of 270 women seekin
g abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of m
ifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 mu g. The
study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without t
he need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after
the administration of misoprostol. Results. Expulsion of the conceptu
s without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of
the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of thos
e who received it orally (P=0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was
7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regime
n (P=0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol va
ginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 perc
ent of the women receiving the drug orally (P<0.001). Vomiting and dia
rrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral mis
oprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P=0.04 and P=
0.002, respectively). Conclusions. After the administration of mifepri
stone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and bet
ter tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trim
ester abortion.