PROPOFOL-FENTANYL VERSUS ISOFLURANE-FENTANYL ANESTHESIA FOR CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING - EFFECT ON MYOCARDIAL-CONTRACTILITY AND PERIPHERAL HEMODYNAMICS
C. Sorbara et al., PROPOFOL-FENTANYL VERSUS ISOFLURANE-FENTANYL ANESTHESIA FOR CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING - EFFECT ON MYOCARDIAL-CONTRACTILITY AND PERIPHERAL HEMODYNAMICS, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 9(1), 1995, pp. 18-23
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
To avoid intraoperative awareness and postoperative respiratory depres
sion from high-dose opioid anesthesia, propofol (P), or isoflurane (I)
has been combined with moderate-dose opioid with varying results. How
ever, the effects of both P and I on myocardial contractility and left
ventricular afterload have not been completely quantified. The end-sy
stolic pressure-diameter relationship (ESPDR) of the left ventricle (L
V) is a reliable method to quantitatively assess LV contractility beca
use it is relatively independent of changes in preload and incorporate
s afterload changes. The purpose of this study was to quantify the car
diodynamic effects of propofol-fentanyl (PF) anesthesia in comparison
with isoflurane-fentanyl (IF) anesthesia in patients undergoing corona
ry artery bypass grafting (CABG). Thirty patients with normal or moder
ately impaired LV function (ejection fraction greater than or equal to
40% with LV end diastolic pressure less than or equal to 18 mmHg, no
preoperative akinesia or dyskinesia) undergoing elective CABG were stu
d led. After premedication with flunitrazepam, 2 mg orally, all patien
ts were induced with thiopental, 1 mg/kg, fentanyl, 20 mu g/kg, and ve
curonium, 0.1 mg/kg, and were ventilated with oxygen/air (F1O2 0.6) An
esthesia was maintained throughout the procedure with a zero-order int
ravenous (IV) continuous infusion of P, 3 mg/kg/h (PF group), or with
isoflurane inhalation of 0.6% (IF group), supplemented by intermittent
boluses (5 mu g/kg) of fentanyl (up to a total maintenance dose of 30
mu g/kg). After intubation, a cross-section of the LV was visualized
by two dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and an m-mode echo
cardiogram was obtained at the maximum anterior-posterior diameter. Th
e radial artery pressure tracing and the ECG were simultaneously recor
ded with the M mode. Slope of ESPDR (Ees) and fractional shortening (F
S) were measured before (T-0) and during P or I administration (T-1).
A contemporary full hemodynamic profile using a pulmonary artery cathe
ter was obtained at T-0 and T-1. Statistical significance was tested w
ith a t test for paired data. No patient experienced awareness of any
intraoperative events. There were no significant differences between T
-0 and T-1 hemodynamic parameters in both PF and IF groups. No signifi
cant decrease of myocardial contractility, measured by Ees (15.3% with
P vs. 11.1% with I), was seen at T-1, together with unchanged filling
pressures (CVP and PCWP). Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), as a myo
cardial perfusion index, was unmodified after both anesthetic drugs. I
n conclusion, low doses of P or I combined with moderate doses of fent
anyl (up to 50 mu g/kg) give adequate levels of anesthesia and good he
modynamic stability. Slightly depressed contractility together with an
unchanged CPP suggest a good myocardial oxygen balance (MDO(2)/MVO(2)
) for both techniques. Copyright (C) 1995 by W.B. Saunders Company