IS INFRAPOPLITEAL BYPASS COMPROMISED BY DISTAL ORIGIN OF THE PROXIMALANASTOMOSIS

Citation
Te. Brothers et al., IS INFRAPOPLITEAL BYPASS COMPROMISED BY DISTAL ORIGIN OF THE PROXIMALANASTOMOSIS, Annals of vascular surgery, 9(2), 1995, pp. 172-178
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
08905096
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
172 - 178
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-5096(1995)9:2<172:IIBCBD>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Distal origination of the proximal anastomosis (DOPA) of an infrapopli teal bypass beyond the adductor hiatus minimizes the length of graft r equired and optimizes use of scarce autogenous conduit. Sixty-two DOPA infrapopliteal revascularizations using autogenous vein performed for limb salvage over a 7-year period were reviewed and compared with 203 concurrent infrapopliteal bypasses originating more proximally (POPA) . Life-table analysis revealed no difference at 54 months between DOPA and POPA bypass with regard to primary patency (57% vs. 50%, respecti vely) or secondary patency (67% vs. 65%, respectively). Differences in limb salvage at 54 months between DOPA and POPA bypasses did not reac h statistical significance (53% vs. 66%, p = 0.12), although DOPA fare d worse. Inferior limb salvage results in all infrapopliteal bypasses were correlated with the presence of tissue necrosis (52% vs. 70%, p < 0.001), which was more prevalent in patients undergoing DOPA bypass ( 71% vs. 49%, p < 0.01). The long-term patency of infrapopliteal bypass appears only marginally affected by DOPA. However, the prognosis for limb salvage in this setting is compromised as a result of the virulen t behavior of the atherosclerotic disease that spares the superficial femoral artery while predominantly involving the popliteal and tibial vessels.