F. Maltais et al., PRESSURE SUPPORT REDUCES INSPIRATORY EFFORT AND DYSPNEA DURING EXERCISE IN CHRONIC AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 151(4), 1995, pp. 1027-1033
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
Exercise training has been of limited success in patients with severe
chronic airflow obstruction (CAO), in part because of the reduced vent
ilatory capacity and excessive dyspnea experienced. Pressure support (
PS) is a new form of mechanical ventilation which can effectively assi
st ventilation when applied noninvasively to patients in acute respira
tory failure. It was hypothesized that PS might also be used to improv
e exercise performance, and ultimately physical conditioning, in ambul
atory patients with CAO undergoing exercise training. To begin to addr
ess this concept, the objectives of the present study were (1) to exam
ine the feasibility of providing PS to exercising patients with CAO an
d (2) to determine its effects on breathing pattern, inspiratory effor
t, and dyspnea. Flow and volume, mouth, esophageal, and gastric pressu
re were measured in seven patients with severe CAO (mean FEV(1) = 0.75
+/- SEM 0.09 L) performing constant workload bicycle exercise (33 +/-
6 watts) during control conditions and with the application of PS (ap
proximately 10 cm H2O). PS increased minute ventilation as a result of
changes in both tidal volume and respiratory rate. This occurred desp
ite marked reductions in inspiratory effort, as indicated by the press
ure-time integrals of esophageal (68 +/- 5% control, p < 0.0005) and t
ransdiaphragmatic pressure (52 +/- 8% control, p < 0.0005). Using a 5-
point bidirectional scale to assess changes in dyspnea, breathlessness
improved significantly with the addition of PS (2.3 +/- 0.6, p < 0.05
) and worsened to a similar degree when it was removed (2.1 +/- 0.5, p
< 0.05). In conclusion, PS was well tolerated in exercising patients
with severe CAO and effectively assisted ventilation, reducing both in
spiratory effort and dyspnea. These results indicate that further work
is warranted to determine whether PS can facilitate exercise recondit
ioning and improve physical fitness in patients enrolled in an exercis
e training program.