EFFECTS OF TIME AND SPERM CONCENTRATION ON REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES FORMATION IN HUMAN SEMEN

Citation
M. Shekarriz et al., EFFECTS OF TIME AND SPERM CONCENTRATION ON REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES FORMATION IN HUMAN SEMEN, Archives of andrology, 34(2), 1995, pp. 69-75
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Andrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01485016
Volume
34
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
69 - 75
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-5016(1995)34:2<69:EOTASC>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Although generally accepted standards exist for routine semen analysis , recent methods of assessing reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human s emen lack a standardized protocol. The purpose of this study was to in vestigate (1) the relationship between ROS level and the time interval between semen collection and analysis, and (2) the effect of sperm co ncentration on the level of ROS formation. Semen specimens from men (n = 40) consulting for infertility treatment were divided in two groups : in 20, routine semen analysis was performed and ROS formation evalua ted at 1, 3, 5, and 24 h after semen collection; in the other 20, ROS formation was evaluated at four sperm concentrations (60, 30, 15, and 7.5 x 10(6)/mL). White blood cell (WBC) concentration was assessed bef ore ROS measurement using a myeloperoxidase staining technique (Endtz test). ROS level was measured by a chemiluminescence method. ROS forma tion decreased significantly over time. The mean ROS level 343.4 (1 h) , 133.5 x 10(4) cpm (3 h, p = .004), 66.0 x 10(4) cpm (5 h, p less tha n or equal to .001), and 22.2 x 10(4) cpm (24 h, p less than or equal to .001), respectively. In the first group of 20 specimens, 14 were po sitive for ROS formation at 1 h after collection, and 4 of these were positive for the Endtz test (>1 x 10(6) WBC/mL). The number of ROS-pos itive specimens after 3, 5, and 24 h was eight, six, and two, respecti vely. In the second group, eight patients were positive for ROS format ion at 1 h after collection. ROS levels were significantly lower at sp erm concentrations of 15 x 10(6)/mL and 7.5 x 10(6)/mL as compared to 30 x 10(6)/mL or 60 x 10(6)/mL (p < .001). The results indicate that R OS level changes significantly at various sperm concentrations prepare d from the same specimen. This change emphasizes the importance of the sperm concentration as a factor when comparing ROS levels between dif ferent positive specimens or between repeated measurements. Secondly, the ROS should be measured within 1 h after semen collection to evalua te the actual incidence of ROS formation.