Il. Abraham et al., CONDITIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES IN NURSING RESEARCH - A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF NORTH-AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS (1981-1990), International journal of nursing studies, 32(2), 1995, pp. 173-187
This study compared the conceptual foci and methodological characteris
tics of research projects which tested the effects of nursing interven
tions, published in four general nursing research journals with predom
inantly North American, and two with predominantly European/Internatio
nal authorship and readership. Dimensions and variables of comparison
included: nature of subjects, design issues, statistical methodology,
statistical power, and types of interventions and outcomes. Although s
ome differences emerged, the most striking and consistent finding was
that there were no statistically significant differences (and thus sim
ilarities) in the content foci and methodological parameters of the in
tervention studies published in both groups of journals. We conclude t
hat European/International and North American nursing intervention stu
dies, as reported in major general nursing research journals, are high
ly similar in the parameters studied, yet in need of overall improveme
nt. Certainly, there is no empirical support for the common (explicit
or implicit) ethnocentric American bias that leadership in nursing int
ervention research resides with and in the United States of America.